Ancak, fruits1 ve fruits3 dizileri aynı elemanlara farklı sıralarda ehil evetğundan, CompareTo metodu farklı bir paha döndürür ve bu dizilerin yapısal olarak yeksan olmadığını belirtir.
A note. Read-only status is derece transferred to other references. You cannot replace the references with other StringBuilder references or the null literal.
That method must return an Enumerator object, which provides the actual support for the looping through the collection. Similarly, code that retrieves an item by the item's position in the collection also looks for the IEnumerable interface and uses the GetEnumerator method. What the Enumerator object doesn't support are the Add or Remove methods. Ignoring the ReadOnlyCollectionBase
Objects everywhere), and it makes the construction wordier (sevimli't use .ToList or collection initializers). And it doesn't really communicate intent either: such a list suggests you could add/remove values, or change them: but that's derece typical usage at all.
A collection that is read-only is simply a collection with a wrapper that prevents modifying the collection; therefore, if changes are made to the underlying collection, the read-only collection reflects those changes.
Your implementation depends on your needs: - If you don't care about the caller (Class B) from seeing any further changes to the collection then C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir you emanet just clone the collection, hand it out, and stop caring. - If you definitely need the C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Kullanımı caller (Class B) to see changes that are made to the collection, and you want this to be thread-safe, then you have more of a sıkıntı on your hands.
Ne sınıf nerde kullanılmalı, bu sınıfların değişiklıkları neler, performansları nasıl üzere temelı soruları bu makalede bile arayalım.
In my example I exposed it all, but you don't have to do this. You can make it read-only if you want, or validate additions to the list, prior to adding them.
well, NHibernate yaşama kaş private class fields and this means that you birey expose it using a public property encapsulating the field as read-only collection.
Fevkdaki adımları kovuşturulma ederek, C# dilinde Queue klasını yakıcı bir şekilde kullanabilirsiniz. Queue klası, muta bünyelarını yönetmek ve iş sıralarını tanzim etmek bağırsakin bayağı kullanışlıdır.
Now the error makes sense, it's true I do not have a default constructor. However I am able to Serialize a ReadOnlyCollection using the DataContractSerializer even though ReadOnlyCollection does hamiş have a parameterless default constructor.
1 Gotta agree with DarkWanderer here. Collections should be just that: collections. There C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nerelerde Kullanılıyor are many other ways to centralize business logic without breaking the single responsibility principle. Plus, making your collection more "clever" may actually confuse the using developer more than it helps him.
I was looking for a similar solution, but I wanted to still be able to modify the collection from inside the class so I C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nerelerde Kullanılıyor chose the option outlined here: In short, his example is: public class MyClass
(There are plenty of other options for wrapping trivially - the birçok thing about Skip C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir over Select/Where is that there's no delegate to execute pointlessly for each iteration.)